tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26765145.post9000067785616895133..comments2023-10-28T03:29:22.230-04:00Comments on Wakefield Étudiant: Schenck v. US (1919)Glen Maganzinihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10084064539361933120noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26765145.post-41363392848822085012009-05-08T15:50:00.000-04:002009-05-08T15:50:00.000-04:00Yeah, you're completely right sadly. I suppose my ...Yeah, you're completely right sadly. I suppose my cynicism went away that day. I guess what I meant is that we've come a long way since then (not to say we won't go back or are going back) and today Schenck would have far more support for his case.Chris Decarlohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04291168675685235711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26765145.post-87963085954690982462009-05-07T15:08:00.000-04:002009-05-07T15:08:00.000-04:00Come on, secretary general of the socialist party ...Come on, secretary general of the socialist party AND telling people not to join the army? Of course nowadays the socialist party's activities are just ignored by the government and mainstream media, but if for some reason Schenk's case went all the way to the Supreme Court, I doubt they'd sympathize.Would they REALLY rule in Schenk's favor today?noreply@blogger.com